Latest mountain bike news

A promotional image featuring a cyclist on a scenic mountain trail, with text describing the exhilaration of outdoor adventure in Tennessee. The message emphasizes physical challenges and the joy of releasing burdens through activities like biking in the Great Smoky Mountains. The Tennessee logo and website are also included.
Two emergency medical service (EMS) personnel on bicycles at night. One person, wearing a helmet and a jacket with "EMS" on the back, is turned to the side while the other, also in a helmet, is sitting on their bike, engaged in conversation. Both are dressed in reflective gear for visibility. The background includes urban structures and street lighting.
A bright red mountain bike with a lightweight aluminum frame, featuring thick tires designed for off-road terrain, a front suspension fork, and multiple gears. The bike is equipped with disc brakes and has a sleek, modern design suitable for outdoor cycling adventures.
  1
A group of mountain bikers races along a dirt trail surrounded by greenery, with a mountain peak in the background and a helicopter flying overhead under a clear blue sky.
I was reading <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/eveningstandard/3971751a6504.html">an article</a> recently about a former landfill in New Zealand that was being developed into a park with mountain bike trails and I realized something: alot of mountain bike trails are in crappy locations (sometimes literally). Essentially it seems like mountain bike trails are often allowed on land that no one really wants to use for anything else.

Some of these trails even have appealing names like <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=439">Tour de Dump</a> in Spartanburg, SC. Others, like <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=1468">Angler's Ridge</a> in Danville, VA sound unassuming but in reality, much of the "ridge" overlooks the city landfill (some of the trail even traverses former dumping sites). In many flat areas of the country landfills provide some of the best terrain for downhill riding so I guess alot of us can't complain.

Not only are mountain bikers relegated to shredding landfill trails but we also have sewer lines to ride as well. Yep, sewer lines are generally located at low points and flood zones where no development can take place so mountain bikers can often be found mucking it up in a haze of sewer gases. A large portion of the <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=622">Chapel Hill High School</a> trails here in NC are in the sewer easement and the <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=583">Big Creek</a> trails in Alpharetta, GA criss cross sewer lines as they wrap around a large swamp. Lovely, eh?

Don't get me wrong - remediation is great and it's awesome that we can turn former piles of garbage into recreation areas. But are mountain bikers the only ones who are desperate enough for places to play that we'll ride just about anywhere? How come it seems like hikers keep some of the most beautiful places for themselves?
<div style="text-align: center;"><img id="image112" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns=
  1
Line graph showing ride log data for speed over a period from January 27, 2007, to February 14, 2007. The vertical axis indicates speed in miles per hour, ranging from 6.8 to 8.9 mph, while the horizontal axis displays dates. A blue line represents the average speed of 7.61 mph. Data points are plotted to show fluctuations in speed throughout the given time period.
  3
A person in a red shirt performs a jump on a bicycle over a small blue vehicle in a forested area, with trees visible in the background. A dog is seen on the ground nearby.
I was reading <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/eveningstandard/3971751a6504.html">an article</a> recently about a former landfill in New Zealand that was being developed into a park with mountain bike trails and I realized something: alot of mountain bike trails are in crappy locations (sometimes literally). Essentially it seems like mountain bike trails are often allowed on land that no one really wants to use for anything else.

Some of these trails even have appealing names like <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=439">Tour de Dump</a> in Spartanburg, SC. Others, like <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=1468">Angler's Ridge</a> in Danville, VA sound unassuming but in reality, much of the "ridge" overlooks the city landfill (some of the trail even traverses former dumping sites). In many flat areas of the country landfills provide some of the best terrain for downhill riding so I guess alot of us can't complain.

Not only are mountain bikers relegated to shredding landfill trails but we also have sewer lines to ride as well. Yep, sewer lines are generally located at low points and flood zones where no development can take place so mountain bikers can often be found mucking it up in a haze of sewer gases. A large portion of the <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=622">Chapel Hill High School</a> trails here in NC are in the sewer easement and the <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=583">Big Creek</a> trails in Alpharetta, GA criss cross sewer lines as they wrap around a large swamp. Lovely, eh?

Don't get me wrong - remediation is great and it's awesome that we can turn former piles of garbage into recreation areas. But are mountain bikers the only ones who are desperate enough for places to play that we'll ride just about anywhere? How come it seems like hikers keep some of the most beautiful places for themselves?
<div style="text-align: center;"><img id="image112" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns=
A screenshot of a webpage displaying mountain bike trails in Colorado, specifically listing trails near Crested Butte. The list includes names such as "Doctor Park," "Dyke," "Farris Creek," and "Reno / Flag / Bear / Deadman," along with corresponding icons for photos and trail rankings.
A person riding a mountain bike on a narrow, winding trail through a wooded area with bare trees and fallen leaves. The cyclist is wearing a helmet and outdoor clothing. The scene captures the natural environment of the trail, emphasizing the adventure of mountain biking.
  2
I was reading <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/eveningstandard/3971751a6504.html">an article</a> recently about a former landfill in New Zealand that was being developed into a park with mountain bike trails and I realized something: alot of mountain bike trails are in crappy locations (sometimes literally). Essentially it seems like mountain bike trails are often allowed on land that no one really wants to use for anything else.

Some of these trails even have appealing names like <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=439">Tour de Dump</a> in Spartanburg, SC. Others, like <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=1468">Angler's Ridge</a> in Danville, VA sound unassuming but in reality, much of the "ridge" overlooks the city landfill (some of the trail even traverses former dumping sites). In many flat areas of the country landfills provide some of the best terrain for downhill riding so I guess alot of us can't complain.

Not only are mountain bikers relegated to shredding landfill trails but we also have sewer lines to ride as well. Yep, sewer lines are generally located at low points and flood zones where no development can take place so mountain bikers can often be found mucking it up in a haze of sewer gases. A large portion of the <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=622">Chapel Hill High School</a> trails here in NC are in the sewer easement and the <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=583">Big Creek</a> trails in Alpharetta, GA criss cross sewer lines as they wrap around a large swamp. Lovely, eh?

Don't get me wrong - remediation is great and it's awesome that we can turn former piles of garbage into recreation areas. But are mountain bikers the only ones who are desperate enough for places to play that we'll ride just about anywhere? How come it seems like hikers keep some of the most beautiful places for themselves?
<div style="text-align: center;"><img id="image112" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns=
  3
I was reading <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/eveningstandard/3971751a6504.html">an article</a> recently about a former landfill in New Zealand that was being developed into a park with mountain bike trails and I realized something: alot of mountain bike trails are in crappy locations (sometimes literally). Essentially it seems like mountain bike trails are often allowed on land that no one really wants to use for anything else.

Some of these trails even have appealing names like <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=439">Tour de Dump</a> in Spartanburg, SC. Others, like <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=1468">Angler's Ridge</a> in Danville, VA sound unassuming but in reality, much of the "ridge" overlooks the city landfill (some of the trail even traverses former dumping sites). In many flat areas of the country landfills provide some of the best terrain for downhill riding so I guess alot of us can't complain.

Not only are mountain bikers relegated to shredding landfill trails but we also have sewer lines to ride as well. Yep, sewer lines are generally located at low points and flood zones where no development can take place so mountain bikers can often be found mucking it up in a haze of sewer gases. A large portion of the <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=622">Chapel Hill High School</a> trails here in NC are in the sewer easement and the <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=583">Big Creek</a> trails in Alpharetta, GA criss cross sewer lines as they wrap around a large swamp. Lovely, eh?

Don't get me wrong - remediation is great and it's awesome that we can turn former piles of garbage into recreation areas. But are mountain bikers the only ones who are desperate enough for places to play that we'll ride just about anywhere? How come it seems like hikers keep some of the most beautiful places for themselves?
<div style="text-align: center;"><img id="image112" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns=
I was reading <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/eveningstandard/3971751a6504.html">an article</a> recently about a former landfill in New Zealand that was being developed into a park with mountain bike trails and I realized something: alot of mountain bike trails are in crappy locations (sometimes literally). Essentially it seems like mountain bike trails are often allowed on land that no one really wants to use for anything else.

Some of these trails even have appealing names like <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=439">Tour de Dump</a> in Spartanburg, SC. Others, like <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=1468">Angler's Ridge</a> in Danville, VA sound unassuming but in reality, much of the "ridge" overlooks the city landfill (some of the trail even traverses former dumping sites). In many flat areas of the country landfills provide some of the best terrain for downhill riding so I guess alot of us can't complain.

Not only are mountain bikers relegated to shredding landfill trails but we also have sewer lines to ride as well. Yep, sewer lines are generally located at low points and flood zones where no development can take place so mountain bikers can often be found mucking it up in a haze of sewer gases. A large portion of the <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=622">Chapel Hill High School</a> trails here in NC are in the sewer easement and the <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=583">Big Creek</a> trails in Alpharetta, GA criss cross sewer lines as they wrap around a large swamp. Lovely, eh?

Don't get me wrong - remediation is great and it's awesome that we can turn former piles of garbage into recreation areas. But are mountain bikers the only ones who are desperate enough for places to play that we'll ride just about anywhere? How come it seems like hikers keep some of the most beautiful places for themselves?
<div style="text-align: center;"><img id="image112" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns=
A vintage red bicycle with a yellow helmet rests on a stage, framed by greenery. The bike is accented by chrome details and a rear basket, and is positioned in front of a large, abstract gray star on a dimly lit background.
I was reading <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/eveningstandard/3971751a6504.html">an article</a> recently about a former landfill in New Zealand that was being developed into a park with mountain bike trails and I realized something: alot of mountain bike trails are in crappy locations (sometimes literally). Essentially it seems like mountain bike trails are often allowed on land that no one really wants to use for anything else.

Some of these trails even have appealing names like <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=439">Tour de Dump</a> in Spartanburg, SC. Others, like <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=1468">Angler's Ridge</a> in Danville, VA sound unassuming but in reality, much of the "ridge" overlooks the city landfill (some of the trail even traverses former dumping sites). In many flat areas of the country landfills provide some of the best terrain for downhill riding so I guess alot of us can't complain.

Not only are mountain bikers relegated to shredding landfill trails but we also have sewer lines to ride as well. Yep, sewer lines are generally located at low points and flood zones where no development can take place so mountain bikers can often be found mucking it up in a haze of sewer gases. A large portion of the <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=622">Chapel Hill High School</a> trails here in NC are in the sewer easement and the <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=583">Big Creek</a> trails in Alpharetta, GA criss cross sewer lines as they wrap around a large swamp. Lovely, eh?

Don't get me wrong - remediation is great and it's awesome that we can turn former piles of garbage into recreation areas. But are mountain bikers the only ones who are desperate enough for places to play that we'll ride just about anywhere? How come it seems like hikers keep some of the most beautiful places for themselves?
<div style="text-align: center;"><img id="image112" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns=
  1
I was reading <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/eveningstandard/3971751a6504.html">an article</a> recently about a former landfill in New Zealand that was being developed into a park with mountain bike trails and I realized something: alot of mountain bike trails are in crappy locations (sometimes literally). Essentially it seems like mountain bike trails are often allowed on land that no one really wants to use for anything else.

Some of these trails even have appealing names like <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=439">Tour de Dump</a> in Spartanburg, SC. Others, like <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=1468">Angler's Ridge</a> in Danville, VA sound unassuming but in reality, much of the "ridge" overlooks the city landfill (some of the trail even traverses former dumping sites). In many flat areas of the country landfills provide some of the best terrain for downhill riding so I guess alot of us can't complain.

Not only are mountain bikers relegated to shredding landfill trails but we also have sewer lines to ride as well. Yep, sewer lines are generally located at low points and flood zones where no development can take place so mountain bikers can often be found mucking it up in a haze of sewer gases. A large portion of the <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=622">Chapel Hill High School</a> trails here in NC are in the sewer easement and the <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=583">Big Creek</a> trails in Alpharetta, GA criss cross sewer lines as they wrap around a large swamp. Lovely, eh?

Don't get me wrong - remediation is great and it's awesome that we can turn former piles of garbage into recreation areas. But are mountain bikers the only ones who are desperate enough for places to play that we'll ride just about anywhere? How come it seems like hikers keep some of the most beautiful places for themselves?
<div style="text-align: center;"><img id="image112" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns=
Logo featuring the word "XTERRA" in bold, stylized text, with a graphic element resembling an "X" stamped above it. The design has a textured, distressed look, predominantly in dark text with a maroon accent.
  1
I was reading <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/eveningstandard/3971751a6504.html">an article</a> recently about a former landfill in New Zealand that was being developed into a park with mountain bike trails and I realized something: alot of mountain bike trails are in crappy locations (sometimes literally). Essentially it seems like mountain bike trails are often allowed on land that no one really wants to use for anything else.

Some of these trails even have appealing names like <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=439">Tour de Dump</a> in Spartanburg, SC. Others, like <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=1468">Angler's Ridge</a> in Danville, VA sound unassuming but in reality, much of the "ridge" overlooks the city landfill (some of the trail even traverses former dumping sites). In many flat areas of the country landfills provide some of the best terrain for downhill riding so I guess alot of us can't complain.

Not only are mountain bikers relegated to shredding landfill trails but we also have sewer lines to ride as well. Yep, sewer lines are generally located at low points and flood zones where no development can take place so mountain bikers can often be found mucking it up in a haze of sewer gases. A large portion of the <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=622">Chapel Hill High School</a> trails here in NC are in the sewer easement and the <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=583">Big Creek</a> trails in Alpharetta, GA criss cross sewer lines as they wrap around a large swamp. Lovely, eh?

Don't get me wrong - remediation is great and it's awesome that we can turn former piles of garbage into recreation areas. But are mountain bikers the only ones who are desperate enough for places to play that we'll ride just about anywhere? How come it seems like hikers keep some of the most beautiful places for themselves?
<div style="text-align: center;"><img id="image112" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns=
I was reading <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/eveningstandard/3971751a6504.html">an article</a> recently about a former landfill in New Zealand that was being developed into a park with mountain bike trails and I realized something: alot of mountain bike trails are in crappy locations (sometimes literally). Essentially it seems like mountain bike trails are often allowed on land that no one really wants to use for anything else.

Some of these trails even have appealing names like <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=439">Tour de Dump</a> in Spartanburg, SC. Others, like <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=1468">Angler's Ridge</a> in Danville, VA sound unassuming but in reality, much of the "ridge" overlooks the city landfill (some of the trail even traverses former dumping sites). In many flat areas of the country landfills provide some of the best terrain for downhill riding so I guess alot of us can't complain.

Not only are mountain bikers relegated to shredding landfill trails but we also have sewer lines to ride as well. Yep, sewer lines are generally located at low points and flood zones where no development can take place so mountain bikers can often be found mucking it up in a haze of sewer gases. A large portion of the <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=622">Chapel Hill High School</a> trails here in NC are in the sewer easement and the <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=583">Big Creek</a> trails in Alpharetta, GA criss cross sewer lines as they wrap around a large swamp. Lovely, eh?

Don't get me wrong - remediation is great and it's awesome that we can turn former piles of garbage into recreation areas. But are mountain bikers the only ones who are desperate enough for places to play that we'll ride just about anywhere? How come it seems like hikers keep some of the most beautiful places for themselves?
<div style="text-align: center;"><img id="image112" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns=
Logo for ActionProfiles, an action sports network, featuring the text "Check out our profile at ActionProfiles" and the tagline "The Action Sports Network" on a dark background.
A man wearing a black cap and a red cycling jersey stands outdoors, with trees and a road sign in the background. He has a serious expression on his face.
I was reading <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/eveningstandard/3971751a6504.html">an article</a> recently about a former landfill in New Zealand that was being developed into a park with mountain bike trails and I realized something: alot of mountain bike trails are in crappy locations (sometimes literally). Essentially it seems like mountain bike trails are often allowed on land that no one really wants to use for anything else.

Some of these trails even have appealing names like <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=439">Tour de Dump</a> in Spartanburg, SC. Others, like <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=1468">Angler's Ridge</a> in Danville, VA sound unassuming but in reality, much of the "ridge" overlooks the city landfill (some of the trail even traverses former dumping sites). In many flat areas of the country landfills provide some of the best terrain for downhill riding so I guess alot of us can't complain.

Not only are mountain bikers relegated to shredding landfill trails but we also have sewer lines to ride as well. Yep, sewer lines are generally located at low points and flood zones where no development can take place so mountain bikers can often be found mucking it up in a haze of sewer gases. A large portion of the <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=622">Chapel Hill High School</a> trails here in NC are in the sewer easement and the <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=583">Big Creek</a> trails in Alpharetta, GA criss cross sewer lines as they wrap around a large swamp. Lovely, eh?

Don't get me wrong - remediation is great and it's awesome that we can turn former piles of garbage into recreation areas. But are mountain bikers the only ones who are desperate enough for places to play that we'll ride just about anywhere? How come it seems like hikers keep some of the most beautiful places for themselves?
<div style="text-align: center;"><img id="image112" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns=
I was reading <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/eveningstandard/3971751a6504.html">an article</a> recently about a former landfill in New Zealand that was being developed into a park with mountain bike trails and I realized something: alot of mountain bike trails are in crappy locations (sometimes literally). Essentially it seems like mountain bike trails are often allowed on land that no one really wants to use for anything else.

Some of these trails even have appealing names like <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=439">Tour de Dump</a> in Spartanburg, SC. Others, like <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=1468">Angler's Ridge</a> in Danville, VA sound unassuming but in reality, much of the "ridge" overlooks the city landfill (some of the trail even traverses former dumping sites). In many flat areas of the country landfills provide some of the best terrain for downhill riding so I guess alot of us can't complain.

Not only are mountain bikers relegated to shredding landfill trails but we also have sewer lines to ride as well. Yep, sewer lines are generally located at low points and flood zones where no development can take place so mountain bikers can often be found mucking it up in a haze of sewer gases. A large portion of the <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=622">Chapel Hill High School</a> trails here in NC are in the sewer easement and the <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=583">Big Creek</a> trails in Alpharetta, GA criss cross sewer lines as they wrap around a large swamp. Lovely, eh?

Don't get me wrong - remediation is great and it's awesome that we can turn former piles of garbage into recreation areas. But are mountain bikers the only ones who are desperate enough for places to play that we'll ride just about anywhere? How come it seems like hikers keep some of the most beautiful places for themselves?
<div style="text-align: center;"><img id="image112" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns=
  2
  3
A Shimano bicycle pedal featuring a silver metallic body and clip mechanism, designed for secure shoe attachment during cycling.
  1
  3
I was reading <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/eveningstandard/3971751a6504.html">an article</a> recently about a former landfill in New Zealand that was being developed into a park with mountain bike trails and I realized something: alot of mountain bike trails are in crappy locations (sometimes literally). Essentially it seems like mountain bike trails are often allowed on land that no one really wants to use for anything else.

Some of these trails even have appealing names like <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=439">Tour de Dump</a> in Spartanburg, SC. Others, like <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=1468">Angler's Ridge</a> in Danville, VA sound unassuming but in reality, much of the "ridge" overlooks the city landfill (some of the trail even traverses former dumping sites). In many flat areas of the country landfills provide some of the best terrain for downhill riding so I guess alot of us can't complain.

Not only are mountain bikers relegated to shredding landfill trails but we also have sewer lines to ride as well. Yep, sewer lines are generally located at low points and flood zones where no development can take place so mountain bikers can often be found mucking it up in a haze of sewer gases. A large portion of the <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=622">Chapel Hill High School</a> trails here in NC are in the sewer easement and the <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=583">Big Creek</a> trails in Alpharetta, GA criss cross sewer lines as they wrap around a large swamp. Lovely, eh?

Don't get me wrong - remediation is great and it's awesome that we can turn former piles of garbage into recreation areas. But are mountain bikers the only ones who are desperate enough for places to play that we'll ride just about anywhere? How come it seems like hikers keep some of the most beautiful places for themselves?
<div style="text-align: center;"><img id="image112" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns=
  1
I was reading <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/eveningstandard/3971751a6504.html">an article</a> recently about a former landfill in New Zealand that was being developed into a park with mountain bike trails and I realized something: alot of mountain bike trails are in crappy locations (sometimes literally). Essentially it seems like mountain bike trails are often allowed on land that no one really wants to use for anything else.

Some of these trails even have appealing names like <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=439">Tour de Dump</a> in Spartanburg, SC. Others, like <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=1468">Angler's Ridge</a> in Danville, VA sound unassuming but in reality, much of the "ridge" overlooks the city landfill (some of the trail even traverses former dumping sites). In many flat areas of the country landfills provide some of the best terrain for downhill riding so I guess alot of us can't complain.

Not only are mountain bikers relegated to shredding landfill trails but we also have sewer lines to ride as well. Yep, sewer lines are generally located at low points and flood zones where no development can take place so mountain bikers can often be found mucking it up in a haze of sewer gases. A large portion of the <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=622">Chapel Hill High School</a> trails here in NC are in the sewer easement and the <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=583">Big Creek</a> trails in Alpharetta, GA criss cross sewer lines as they wrap around a large swamp. Lovely, eh?

Don't get me wrong - remediation is great and it's awesome that we can turn former piles of garbage into recreation areas. But are mountain bikers the only ones who are desperate enough for places to play that we'll ride just about anywhere? How come it seems like hikers keep some of the most beautiful places for themselves?
<div style="text-align: center;"><img id="image112" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns=
A bright orange mountain bike with blue patterned rims resting against a gray concrete wall. The bike features a sleek design with a sturdy frame and front suspension, positioned on a dark asphalt surface.
A person riding a mountain bike along a dirt trail in a wooded area, surrounded by bare trees and fallen leaves. The cyclist is wearing a pink top and a helmet.
I was reading <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/eveningstandard/3971751a6504.html">an article</a> recently about a former landfill in New Zealand that was being developed into a park with mountain bike trails and I realized something: alot of mountain bike trails are in crappy locations (sometimes literally). Essentially it seems like mountain bike trails are often allowed on land that no one really wants to use for anything else.

Some of these trails even have appealing names like <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=439">Tour de Dump</a> in Spartanburg, SC. Others, like <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=1468">Angler's Ridge</a> in Danville, VA sound unassuming but in reality, much of the "ridge" overlooks the city landfill (some of the trail even traverses former dumping sites). In many flat areas of the country landfills provide some of the best terrain for downhill riding so I guess alot of us can't complain.

Not only are mountain bikers relegated to shredding landfill trails but we also have sewer lines to ride as well. Yep, sewer lines are generally located at low points and flood zones where no development can take place so mountain bikers can often be found mucking it up in a haze of sewer gases. A large portion of the <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=622">Chapel Hill High School</a> trails here in NC are in the sewer easement and the <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=583">Big Creek</a> trails in Alpharetta, GA criss cross sewer lines as they wrap around a large swamp. Lovely, eh?

Don't get me wrong - remediation is great and it's awesome that we can turn former piles of garbage into recreation areas. But are mountain bikers the only ones who are desperate enough for places to play that we'll ride just about anywhere? How come it seems like hikers keep some of the most beautiful places for themselves?
<div style="text-align: center;"><img id="image112" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns=
I was reading <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/eveningstandard/3971751a6504.html">an article</a> recently about a former landfill in New Zealand that was being developed into a park with mountain bike trails and I realized something: alot of mountain bike trails are in crappy locations (sometimes literally). Essentially it seems like mountain bike trails are often allowed on land that no one really wants to use for anything else.

Some of these trails even have appealing names like <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=439">Tour de Dump</a> in Spartanburg, SC. Others, like <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=1468">Angler's Ridge</a> in Danville, VA sound unassuming but in reality, much of the "ridge" overlooks the city landfill (some of the trail even traverses former dumping sites). In many flat areas of the country landfills provide some of the best terrain for downhill riding so I guess alot of us can't complain.

Not only are mountain bikers relegated to shredding landfill trails but we also have sewer lines to ride as well. Yep, sewer lines are generally located at low points and flood zones where no development can take place so mountain bikers can often be found mucking it up in a haze of sewer gases. A large portion of the <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=622">Chapel Hill High School</a> trails here in NC are in the sewer easement and the <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/php/trail.php?id=583">Big Creek</a> trails in Alpharetta, GA criss cross sewer lines as they wrap around a large swamp. Lovely, eh?

Don't get me wrong - remediation is great and it's awesome that we can turn former piles of garbage into recreation areas. But are mountain bikers the only ones who are desperate enough for places to play that we'll ride just about anywhere? How come it seems like hikers keep some of the most beautiful places for themselves?
<div style="text-align: center;"><img id="image112" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns=
  1
Lance leads this leg of the 2005 Tour de Georgia with Floyd Landis in hot pursuit.
Sock with a cartoon chicken design, featuring a red and white color scheme and the text "Ya Clucken" printed on the side, displayed on a wooden surface.