Editor’s Note: “Over a Beer” is a regular opinion column written by Greg Heil. While Greg is the Editor in Chief for Singletracks.com, the opinions expressed in this commentary are his alone and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Singletracks.com.
After SRAM’s recent announcement of their new Eagle 1×12 drivetrain, the internet veritably exploded with angry mountain bikers foaming at the mouth and gnashing their teeth about “how horrible this is, that this new technology is being forced upon us.”
Those same commenters said the same thing about Boost 148.
And 27.5+.
And 1×11.
And 27.5.
And fat bikes.
And 2×10.
And 29ers,
And… the list goes on.
But here’s the thing: this technology is NOT being forced upon you. You don’t have to buy 1×12… unless you want to.
It seems to me that some of these naysayers think that just because a new drivetrain has rolled out, that support for everything that ever existed before has ceased.
That’s simply not the case.
A quick Google search reveals that 3×9 drivetrain parts are still readily available from many distributors—brand new. While not as widely available, 3×8 can still easily be purchased. And 7-speed… etc.
With the millions of bikes that have been sold over the years, and with industrious folks looking to make a buck, I see no reason why you won’t be able to buy parts that are as common as a drivetrain, for a bike from most any era since mountain biking manufacturers started standardizing components across brand lines.
While I am fortunate enough to own some pretty nice mountain bikes, my road bike isn’t nearly as new. In fact, it’s a ’99 GT triple triangle with an old quill threaded stem/headset. This was a horrible design and idea, and I wouldn’t recommend buying one to anybody, but I was able to go online, and replace my fork with a new carbon fork with a threaded steerer, for not very much money.
The parts are out there.
One of our local shops (we have three in a town of 5,500—that’s just crazy, but a topic for another time) sort of specializes in restoring old cruisers and making them run and ride well again. Many of the bikes that end up in this shop’s work stands are older than the oldest mountain bikes in existence—they predate our entire sport! Despite what might seem like insurmountable age, the mechanics are still able to locate, order, and install the parts that the owner of the cruiser in question needs in order to pedal down to the bar next week.
So do you need to buy 1×12? Hell no! But do you want to buy 1×12, and do you hate yourself for wanting to spend $1,500 bucks right this instant for a GOLD drivetrain?! Yeah, maybe a little.
11 Comments
Apr 14, 2016
Apr 14, 2016
I guess my point without too much further rambling is that I'm agreeing with Greg. Nothing wrong with new tech. It's great. Nothing wrong with riding older frames either. A lot of the newer parts will work and are an amazing upgrade. Problem is when you get used to having the higher end parts on your bike and you ride a newer bike with the standard build parts. You just wanna immediately upgrade the bits. So you tend to think in terms of frames and parts instead of whole bikes. Makes a tinkerer out of you.
Apr 14, 2016
May 24, 2016
Apr 13, 2016
Apr 17, 2016
Apr 14, 2016
Apr 14, 2016
Apr 14, 2016
Thanks for asking! :)
Apr 14, 2016
Apr 15, 2016
so in spite of having high enough gears in a formal sence the two top gears are useless toys for anything but casual transport inbetween trails
to uphold race speed on gravel road sections any length of time you need a big enough chainwheel to remain on 13t cogs and bigger. 12 can be acceptable, but definitely not 11. at the same time arranging for climbing gears with that single chainring which really needs to be 40 or bigger means cogs of ridiculous size and weight.